We are indeed talking about the same thing. Weird, I know. ![:)]( "Smile")
I must admit I hadn't looked too closely at that code and I stand corrected - the original code doesn't even follow its documentation - it treats having any bit matching the mask as meaning 1 for all.![:?]( "Confused")
That is an interesting approach.
I must admit I hadn't looked too closely at that code and I stand corrected - the original code doesn't even follow its documentation - it treats having any bit matching the mask as meaning 1 for all.
That is an interesting approach.
Statistics: Posted by warthog618 — Tue Sep 17, 2024 11:12 pm