Makes sense, although the pipeline is using about 200% cpu (two cores). I don't know what else in the pipeline would use that much juice.I believe the zerolatency option disables multicore encode and so the benefits of numa are limited.
I'd expect better numa results for a non-zerolatency encode.
I'd try it without zerolatency, but for some reason it never produces packets without that parameter.
Statistics: Posted by hackbar — Thu Dec 12, 2024 5:13 pm
